What Is Biophilic Interior Design?

Biophilic interior design is an interior design approach that builds direct and indirect connections to nature into indoor spaces to improve occupant wellbeing. Daylight, plants, natural materials, water and organic forms are treated as design inputs, not finishing touches.

A shelf of pothos is decoration, while turning a desk toward a window view is design, the same line that separates interior design from decoration in general.

Where the term comes from

  • Erich Fromm, 1973: introduced the word biophilia in The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness to describe a love of life and everything alive
  • Edward O. Wilson, 1984: gave the idea an evolutionary reading in his book Biophilia, proposing that the human tendency to affiliate with nature and other life forms has a partly genetic basis
  • Stephen Kellert, 2008: turned the hypothesis into a design framework in Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life

Britannica and a 2021 review in Frontiers in Psychology trace the term and its evolutionary reading the same way.

How it differs from green design and biomimicry

Green design targets energy use and material impact. Biophilic design targets how people feel and function in the space, so a room can score well on one and poorly on the other.

Biomimicry copies strategies from nature to solve engineering problems, such as a structure modeled on the lattice of a bone. Biophilic design puts people in contact with nature, and Learn Biomimicry points out that one building can use both: biomimicry in the structure, biophilic patterns inside.

The 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design and How Kellert’s Framework Fits

Two frameworks dominate practice: Terrapin Bright Green’s 14 Patterns, which sorts nature-design relationships into 3 categories, and Kellert’s model of 3 experiences of nature. They cover the same territory at different levels of detail, so a designer can work from either.

How the 14 Patterns are organized

Terrapin released the report on 29 September 2014, after mining over 500 publications on biophilic responses for patterns useful to designers.

The 10th Anniversary Edition, published on 4 December 2024, added a fifteenth pattern called Awe, so the set now runs to 15 under the same title (Terrapin styles it “14+ Patterns” on its site). Sources disagree on the date: Terrapin’s report page credits the 2024 edition, while a University of Minnesota framework page dates the fifteenth pattern to 2020, the year of the RIBA guide Nature Inside.

Category Patterns Interior translation
Nature in the Space (7) Visual connection with nature, non-visual connection, non-rhythmic sensory stimuli, thermal and airflow variability, presence of water, dynamic and diffuse light, connection with natural systems Plants, window views, tabletop water, operable windows, daylight that shifts through the day
Natural Analogues (3) Biomorphic forms and patterns, material connection with nature, complexity and order Wood grain, stone, curved furniture, layered natural textures
Nature of the Space (5) Prospect, refuge, mystery, risk and peril, awe Long sightlines, window nooks, curved hallways, glass balcony edges, high-volume atriums

Terrapin’s own guidance is that the most successful biophilic spaces tend to combine more than one pattern.

Where Kellert’s framework fits

Kellert’s model changed shape twice. The 2008 version held two dimensions, six elements and 70 attributes.

Kellert and Calabrese (2015) simplified that into direct experience of nature, indirect experience of nature, and experience of space and place. Kellert’s 2018 book Nature by Design settled on those 3 experiences with 25 attributes.

Set side by side, the two frameworks reduce to the same three-way split. Terrapin’s Nature in the Space matches direct experience, Natural Analogues matches indirect experience, and Nature of the Space matches space and place, which is how the University of Minnesota’s Biophilic Net-Positive Design Project nests Kellert’s attributes under Terrapin’s categories.

Terrapin’s list is shorter and leaves interpretation to the designer. That makes it the easier of the two to brief a single room against.

Which Design Elements Bring Nature Into an Interior?

Indoor plants and a living wall

Six elements do most of the work: plants, daylight and views, natural materials, water, earth-tone color and organic form. Start with light and views, because plants and materials underperform in a room that has neither.

Plants and living walls

Live plants are the most visible direct element and the easiest to get wrong. Interface’s Human Spaces report found live plants positively associated with workers’ creativity.

  • Measure light at each spot before buying
  • Budget for watering and pruning, not only the purchase
  • Choose real plants over simulated ones

Terrapin’s guidance ranks real nature above simulated nature, and simulated nature above none.

Living walls are building systems, not shelves. Patrick Blanc’s hydroponic Mur Vegetal, the system that popularized the modern living wall, usually needs artificial lighting indoors and runs on automated watering and fertilizing, per Blanc’s own system description.

For layouts by room, browse these ideas for arranging indoor plants, but check the light first.

Daylight, views and ventilation

A daylight-rich room can still fail the view test. Terrapin Bright Green’s 2015 write-up of a Sacramento Municipal Utility District call center describes a finding credited to Lisa Heschong: every employee had good daylight access, but workstations sat perpendicular to the windows, so staff had to move their chairs to see the trees outside.

  • Blinds: closed blinds remove the visual connection with nature, so specify treatments that keep daylight and views
  • Partitions: high partitions in an open-plan office remove prospect and several other patterns
  • Air: thermal and airflow variability means subtle shifts in temperature, humidity and airflow, for instance through operable windows
  • Light quality: the dynamic and diffuse light pattern asks for light and shadow that change over time, as they do outdoors

The blinds and partition points come from Terrapin’s 14 Patterns report, which cites Urban Green Council (2013).

Materials, color and form

The Material Connection with Nature pattern covers materials that reflect local ecology or geology after minimal processing, according to Terrapin.

  • Solid wood, stone, cork, and natural fibres such as linen, jute and wool
  • Stone, clay and sand tones instead of saturated accent colors
  • Curved edges, arches and organic outlines in furniture and openings

Stone, clay and sand tones carry the palette, and this guide to building an earthy color palette covers the pairings.

Wood earned its place in the Human Spaces data too, where its use in office design was positively associated with creativity.

Biomorphic forms are the weakest link. Terrapin’s report says the science explaining why they work is not yet formulated.

Water, sound and other senses

The presence of water pattern covers seeing, hearing or touching water. A tabletop fountain can deliver the hearing and touching parts when a full water wall is out of budget.

The non-visual connection pattern extends the same logic to sound, touch and scent that point to natural systems. RMCAD’s design guide makes the same point: biophilic design goes beyond what people see by adding sound, texture, scent and movement.

What Does the Research Say About Biophilic Design and Wellbeing?

Studies link views of nature, daylight and natural elements to lower stress, faster recovery and higher self-reported wellbeing. Most of the evidence comes from small samples or self-reports, so the strongest claims rest on views and real nature rather than decorative motifs.

  • Hospital recovery: 23 surgical patients with a natural window view had shorter postoperative stays and took fewer potent analgesics than 23 matched patients facing a brick wall (Ulrich, Science, 1984)
  • Workplace: across 7,600 office workers in 16 countries, those with natural elements at work reported 15% higher wellbeing, 6% higher productivity and 15% higher creativity (Human Spaces, Interface, 2015)
  • Exposure time: positive emotions and mental restoration can begin after 5 to 20 minutes of immersion in nature (Terrapin Bright Green, 14 Patterns)

Two theories explain the mechanism. Kaplan’s attention restoration theory holds that natural settings replenish directed attention, and Ulrich’s stress reduction theory holds that they speed recovery from stress.

Source What it measured Limit
Ulrich, 1984 Hospital stay, analgesic use, nurse notes 23 matched pairs, one hospital
Human Spaces, 2015 Self-reported wellbeing, productivity, creativity Self-reported, commissioned by a flooring maker
14 Patterns, 2024 edition Research mapped to design patterns Not every pattern has updated science

Read together, the three sources agree on direction and disagree on what they can prove. A 1984 record review, a self-report survey and a literature synthesis do not add up to a dose-response curve.

Spend on views, daylight and real plants first. Treat decorative motifs as unproven until the research catches up.

How Is Biophilic Interior Design Used in Homes, Offices and Healthcare?

It scales from one room to a campus. Homes rely on light, materials and a few plants, offices add planted amenity space, and healthcare settings use views and daylight to support recovery.

Homes

Residential settings get less attention than hospitals, according to a 2022 viewpoint in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. The authors propose pairing biophilic features with lighting, aromatherapy and soundscapes for people living with migraines, chronic pain and depression.

That is a design proposal, not a trial result.

  • Seating turned toward the best window
  • Wood, stone or natural fibre on surfaces people touch daily
  • A few large plants matched to the light each room receives

Terrapin’s report frames every intervention the same way: it follows the needs of the people using that particular space.

Offices

Amazon’s Spheres in Seattle hold more than 40,000 plants from over 30 countries, according to Amazon’s own tour of the buildings. The living wall ranks among the largest indoor ones in North America.

The horticulture team picks plants from cooler tropical climates so the space stays comfortable for people as well as for the plants.

A Spheres-scale project is a destination, not a template for an ordinary office floor.

Healthcare and public interiors

  • Staff spaces: Terrapin’s report describes a project that applied the Visual Connection pattern to a shared space to reduce stress for emergency room nurses
  • Airports: Jewel Changi Airport centers on the Rain Vortex, called the world’s tallest indoor waterfall in CNBC’s 2019 coverage, which sends rain-harvested, recirculated water down seven stories from the roof

Both flagship cases had to reconcile plant climate with human comfort. Amazon chose cooler tropical species, and Jewel’s builders listed keeping the temperature comfortable for both visitors and plants among their design challenges (Mothership, 2019).

How Do WELL and the Living Building Challenge Treat Biophilia?

Green building standards reward biophilic interior design in different ways. WELL sets measurable thresholds for views and planting, while the Living Building Challenge requires a documented plan.

Standard Where biophilia sits What it asks for
WELL v2 (IWBI) Mind concept, features M02 and M09 Measurable views and access to nature
Living Building Challenge 4.0 (ILFI) Imperative 19, Beauty and Biophilia Workshops that produce a biophilic plan
LEED (USGBC) Pilot credit EQpc123 A plan of distinct strategies mapped to Terrapin’s categories
Fitwel Views of Nature strategy Annotated plans proving qualifying views

WELL Building Standard

WELL v1 Feature 100 required potted plants or planted beds on at least 1% of floor area per floor, plus a plant wall per floor covering at least 2% of floor area (International WELL Building Institute).

In WELL v2 the requirement moved into the Mind concept as features M02 (Nature and Place) and M09 (Enhanced Access to Nature). IWBI’s addenda say M09 was later simplified so project teams can mix and match strategies.

Secondary summaries of M09 disagree on the distance to nearby green or blue space, so read the live feature text before designing to a number.

Living Building Challenge

  • Version 4.0: Imperative 19, Beauty and Biophilia, requires workshops totaling 8 hours that produce a biophilic framework and plan (Yale Living Village’s summary of the standard)
  • Version 3.1: a separate Biophilic Environment imperative sat in the Health and Happiness Petal, with the same 8-hour exploration (Georgia Tech)

The Kendeda Building at Georgia Tech met the 3.1 requirement by writing a Biophilic Framework with notes, findings and implementation strategies. Both versions ask for a process and a plan, not a plant count.

LEED and Fitwel

Both ask for evidence, not a shopping list.

LEED handled biophilia through pilot credit EQpc123, Designing with Nature, Biophilic Design for the Indoor Environment. Its credit language calls for a plan with at least five distinct design strategies, each classified under Terrapin’s patterns.

Pilot credits are experimental, so confirm the credit is open for your LEED version before planning around it.

Fitwel scores a Views of Nature strategy and rejects proof taken at the window. Its help center says photographs must show that regularly occupied workstations have direct views of nature.

A homeowner or a single-room fit-out needs none of these. Use them as briefs instead: WELL for a numeric target on views and planting, the Living Building Challenge for a workshop process.

How Much Does Biophilic Interior Design Cost?

Biophilic elements in a bathroom

Cost tracks how deep the intervention goes. Light and layout changes are cheap, material swaps scale with floor area, and a living wall dominates the budget once lighting, irrigation and upkeep are counted.

Option Installed cost Upkeep Main failure risk
Plants and light changes Low Watering, pruning Plants die in poor light
Natural material swaps Priced per square meter Low Bill scales with floor area
Living wall High Service contract Irrigation or drainage failure
Preserved moss wall Close to a living wall Almost none Not living nature

Natural materials are priced by area

A 2026 cost guide from the UDIT design school in Spain prices natural finishes per square meter. Mineral paint and jute carpet sit at the low end, solid wood and natural stone near the top, and marble or granite worktops above both.

Because the bill scales with area, work out the wall surface first and run it through a paint calculator before comparing quotes for mineral paint or clay plaster.

Why living wall prices disagree

Sources quote installed living wall costs in different units and currencies. Gable’s 2026 office design guide gives $150 to $300 per square foot, while MyBuilder’s UK price guide gives a total installation example of 500 to 800 British pounds per square meter.

Even the top of the UK range sits below the low end of the US one once both are converted to the same unit. Scope explains most of the gap: the UK example builds up a wall system, site preparation and irrigation, and MyBuilder lists supplemental lighting for indoor walls as a hidden extra.

Upkeep estimates diverge as well. Viritopia, a living wall maintenance provider, puts annual maintenance at 6 to 10% of the installation cost, while Gable puts it at $30 to $50 per square foot per year, roughly 10 to 33% of Gable’s own install range.

All of these are vendor or price-guide figures, not audited data. Read the direction as reliable and the size as negotiable.

Ask any quote to itemize:

  • Lighting for indoor walls
  • Irrigation and drainage
  • The service contract and its visit frequency
  • Plant replacement

Living wall or preserved moss wall

Gable’s guide says preserved (stabilized) moss walls cost roughly the same to install as living ones and need almost no maintenance.

Living wall:

  • Pro: real plants, the strongest form of nature in the room
  • Con: needs lighting, irrigation and a service contract
  • Con: sections can fail and need costly replacement when irrigation or drainage goes wrong (Viritopia)

Preserved moss wall:

  • Pro: almost no maintenance and no irrigation on the wall
  • Con: stabilized moss is no longer alive, so it sits closer to simulated nature

In most rooms the better first spend is the window view and a few well-lit plants. Buy the wall only when lighting, irrigation and a service contract are already in the budget.

If the wall is part of a wider refit, a home renovation cost calculator gives a starting total for the rest of the work.

How to Start Biophilic Interior Design in One Room

Biophilic living room

Measure the room’s light and views first, choose two or three patterns that fit the people using it, then add materials, plants and water in that order. Assign upkeep before buying anything living.

  1. Map light and views. Note which windows get direct sun, what the main seat can see, and where blinds or partitions block sightlines.
  2. Choose 2 or 3 patterns. Terrapin’s own advice is to filter patterns by the needs of the people using the space, so a focus room might take visual connection and dynamic light while a rest room takes refuge and material connection.
  3. Fix seating and openings. Turn the main seat toward the best window and open the blinds before spending anything.
  4. Add natural materials to touch surfaces. Wood, stone, cork or natural fibre where hands land every day.
  5. Add plants sized to the measured light. Water or sound comes last, if the budget allows.
  6. Assign the upkeep. Name who waters, prunes and replaces, and how often, before the first plant arrives.

Evening light matters as much as daylight, and the role of light in interior design covers how to layer it after dark.

For wood-led rooms, browse these wooden interior design ideas.

The Living Building Challenge’s workshop requirement follows the same order: explore first, write a framework, then implement. Skipping the first step is the usual failure, because plants bought first end up in the wrong light.

When Biophilic Interior Design Falls Short

Japandi interior with natural materials

It falls short in four cases: rooms too dark for plants, projects with no upkeep budget, plants sold as air purifiers, and patterns chosen without regard to who uses the space.

Unfunded upkeep

  • Irrigation and drainage: Viritopia says large sections of a wall can fail and need costly replacement when irrigation is off, drainage clogs or pests take hold
  • Dry-out: the same provider warns that a neglected wall carries a greater fire risk if irrigation fails and the system dries out
  • Neglect: Scotscape, a UK living wall supplier, states that walls will not survive without monitoring, seasonal pruning and irrigation management

Both companies sell maintenance, so weigh the tone with that in mind. The failure pattern they describe is consistent across the vendor guides found.

The air-purifier claim

Plants do not clean indoor air fast enough to matter in a ventilated building. Drexel University researchers Bryan Cummings and Michael Waring reviewed a dozen studies in 2019 and found that normal air exchange dilutes volatile organic compounds far faster than plants remove them.

The claim traces to NASA’s 1989 Clean Air Study, which tested plants in sealed chambers. Sell plants for what the evidence supports (views, mood, stress) and handle air quality with ventilation.

Patterns that do not fit the users

Patterns are not universal comforts.

Terrapin’s 2014 report notes that an urban woodland can read as adventure to a teenager and as risk to older adults, citing Kopec (2006).

A glass balcony edge (Risk/Peril) or a tall atrium (Awe) that thrills one occupant can unsettle another, so test the pattern on the people who will use the room. Where daylight is scarce and the upkeep budget is thin, natural materials, texture and layout carry more of the load than planting does.

Andreea Dima
Latest posts by Andreea Dima (see all)
Author

Andreea Dima is a certified interior designer and founder of AweDeco, with over 13 years of professional experience transforming residential and commercial spaces across Romania. Andreea has completed over 100 design projects since 2012. All content on AweDeco is based on her hands-on design practice and professional expertise.

Pin It